4.1 Article

Search for a Distressed Swimmer in a Dynamic, Real-World Environment

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 352-368

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/xap0000344

关键词

lifeguarding; drowning detection; dynamic visual search; eye-movements; real-world search scenes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that experienced lifeguards were more likely and faster to detect distressed swimmers in a busy swimming pool compared to non-lifeguards. Different methodological approaches showed that the occlusion method may be more suitable for dynamic target detection than traditional response-time tests.
Visual search is increasingly being explored in dynamic, real-world environments. This includes swimming pools, where lifeguards have shown superior drowning detection in simulated environments. Here, we explored if lifeguard superiority is observed in real-life scenes of a busy swimming pool. Experiment 1 required participants to identify real-life distressed swimmers in clips of busy pool activity via a touchscreen interface. Experiment 2 sought to replicate the first study, with the inclusion of eye-movement measures. Experiment 3 varied the methodology, using an occlusion method where clips were frozen and blurred shortly after target onset. The results demonstrated an experience effect, with lifeguards detecting distressed swimmers more often and faster than nonlifeguards. No clear differences were found in the eye-movements between groups; thus, we cannot conclude that the lifeguards' faster responses are due to better scanning strategies. The different methodological approaches revealed the occlusion method to have the larger effect size, supporting the growing evidence that occlusion may be a better test for dynamic target detection than traditional response-time tests. This research demonstrates that the clear lifeguard experience effect generalizes to real-life pool environments with a large number of swimmers and real incidents. It could be used to inform lifeguard training tools and assessments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据