3.8 Article

Geospatial Analysis of Neighborhood Environmental Stress in Relation to Biological Markers of Cardiovascular Health and Health Behaviors in Women: Protocol for a Pilot Study

期刊

JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/29191

关键词

wearables; global positioning system; ecological momentary assessment; accelerometer; biomarkers of stress; mobile phone

资金

  1. Division of Intramural Research of the NHLBI of the NIH
  2. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the NIH
  3. 2019 Lenfant Biomedical Fellowship Award from the NHLBI
  4. NIH
  5. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  6. Genentech
  7. American Association for Dental Research
  8. Colgate-Palmolive Company, Elsevier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate the relationship between neighborhood social conditions, stress-related neural activity, vascular function, and immune system activation through objective measurements of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and neighborhood stress among White and African American women in Washington, DC. The research will recruit 60 healthy women from high and low socioeconomic status neighborhoods in the DC area, exploring the impact of adverse neighborhood environments on biological and psychological health outcomes.
Background: Innovative analyses of cardiovascular (CV) risk markers and health behaviors linked to neighborhood stressors are essential to further elucidate the mechanisms by which adverse neighborhood social conditions lead to poor CV outcomes. We propose to objectively measure physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior, and neighborhood stress using accelerometers, GPS, and real-time perceived ecological momentary assessment via smartphone apps and to link these to biological measures in a sample of White and African American women in Washington, DC, neighborhoods. Objective: The primary aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that living in adverse neighborhood social conditions is associated with higher stress-related neural activity among 60 healthy women living in high or low socioeconomic status neighborhoods in Washington, DC. Sub-aim 1 of this study is to test the hypothesis that the association is moderated by objectively measured PA using an accelerometer. A secondary objective is to test the hypothesis that residing in adverse neighborhood social environment conditions is related to differences in vascular function. Sub-aim 2 of this study is to test the hypothesis that the association is moderated by objectively measured PA. The third aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that adverse neighborhood social environment conditions are related to differences in immune system activation. Methods: The proposed study will be cross-sectional, with a sample of at least 60 women (30 healthy White women and 30 healthy Black women) from Wards 3 and 5 in Washington, DC. A sample of the women (n=30) will be recruited from high-income areas in Ward 3 from census tracts within a 15% of Ward 3's range for median household income. The other participants (n=30) will be recruited from low-income areas in Wards 5 from census tracts within a 15% of Ward 5's range for median household income. Finally, participants from Wards 3 and 5 will be matched based on age, race, and BMI. Participants will wear a GP S unit and accelerometer and report their stress and mood in real time using a smartphone. We will then examine the associations between GPS-derived neighborhood variables, stress-related neural activity measures, and adverse biological markers. Results: The National Institutes of Health Institutional Review Board has approved this study. Recruitment will begin in the summer of 2021. Conclusions: Findings from this research could inform the development of multilevel behavioral interventions and policies to better manage environmental factors that promote immune system activation or psychosocial stress while concurrently working to increase PA, thereby influencing CV health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据