4.5 Article

ESG investing: A chance to reduce systemic risk

期刊

JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100887

关键词

ESG investing; Systemic risk; Market impact; Network; Indirect contagion

资金

  1. Morningstar [OPP635470]
  2. University of Perugia (Fondo Ricerca di Base)
  3. Ministero dell'Universita e della Ricerca [SIF16_00055]
  4. Etica Sgr [R01-2019]
  5. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Perugia [2017.0226.021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes a network of equity mutual funds with different ESG ratings, finding that high ESG ranked funds experience lower market value loss during periods of lower volatility. However, there is not always a clear dominance of one class over another in periods of higher volatility.
We consider a network of equity mutual funds characterized by different levels of compliance with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) aspects. We measure the impact of portfolio liquidation in a stress scenario on funds with different ESG ratings. Fire-sales spillover from portfolio liquidation propagates from one fund to another through indirect contagion mediated by common asset holdings. The analysis is conducted quarterly from March 2016 through June 2018 using daily data from different sources at the fund and firm levels. Our estimation strategy relies on a network analysis where funds are not taken as standalone entities but are interconnected components of a unified system. We find evidence that the relative market value loss of the High ESG ranked funds is lower than the loss experienced by the Low ESG ranked counterparts in the time span with lower volatility. In the higher-volatility period there is not always a clear dominance of one class over another. Results are robust when controlling for size and for feedback effects, and for different model specifications. Our analysis offers new insights to both asset managers and policymakers to exploit the aggregate effect of portfolio diversification related to the system as a whole. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据