4.3 Article

He got a glimpse of the joys of understanding - The role of epistemic empathy in teacher learning

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 433-465

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2021.1936534

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DRL 1844453]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study emphasizes the importance of teachers' affective experiences in the discipline for their learning how to teach. Additionally, it highlights epistemic empathy as an important aspect and target for teacher learning.
Background: Efforts to promote reform-based instruction have overlooked the import of affect in teacher learning. Drawing on prior work, I argue that teachers' affective experiences in the discipline are integral to their learning how to teach the discipline. Moreover, I suggest that both affective and epistemological aspects of teachers' experiences can serve to cultivate their epistemic empathy-the capacity for tuning into and valuing someone's intellectual and emotional experience within an epistemic activity-in ways that support student-centered instruction. Methods: Using a case study approach, I examine the learning journey of one preservice teacher, Keith, who after having expressed strong skepticism about responsive teaching, came to value and take up responsive teaching in his instruction. Findings: The analysis identifies epistemological and affective dynamics in Keith's interactions with students and in his relationship with science that fostered his epistemic empathy. By easing his worries about arriving at correct answers, Keith's epistemic empathy shifted his attention toward supporting students' sensemaking and nurturing their relationships with the discipline. Contributions: These findings highlights teachers' affective experiences in the discipline as integral to their learning how to teach; they also call attention to epistemic empathy as an important aspect of and target for teacher learning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据