4.6 Article

Negatively biased cognition as a mechanism of mindfulness: a review of the literature

期刊

CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY
卷 42, 期 11, 页码 8946-8962

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-02147-y

关键词

Mindfulness; Negatively biased cognition; Depression; Anxiety; Review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mindfulness-based interventions are effective in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety. One possible mechanism for these benefits is a reduction in negatively biased cognition. The reviewed literature suggests that mindfulness is inversely associated with negatively biased cognition, and that this association indirectly reduces depression and anxiety symptoms.
Mindfulness-based interventions are efficacious in reducing depression and anxiety symptoms, but mechanisms underlying these benefits have not been fully elucidated. Based on cognitive theories of depression and anxiety, a reduction in negatively biased cognition may be one mechanism. We reviewed the empirical literature on mindfulness and negatively biased cognition. Thirty-seven studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria. The evidence generally indicated that mindfulness was inversely associated with negatively biased cognition, across various measures (i.e., self-reported negatively biased cognitive styles and cognitive responses to tasks involving valenced stimuli), study designs (i.e., correlational, quasi-experimental, and experimental), and samples (i.e., unselected and clinical). However, the relation was mixed for cognitive reactivity to negative emotions in recurrent depression and null for indices of quick behavioral control. Correlational evidence in unselected samples also supported an indirect relation between mindfulness and fewer depression and anxiety symptoms through less negatively biased cognition. Mindfulness may be useful for addressing this intended mechanism of traditional cognitive-behavioral therapy. Future research should more directly test the role of negatively biased cognition in protective and therapeutic effects of mindfulness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据