4.5 Review

Conceptualization and measurement of digital citizenship across disciplines

期刊

EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100379

关键词

Digital citizenship; Conceptualization; Measurement

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of the HKSAR Government [T44707/16/N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The exponential growth of digital technology has led to increased research interest in the construct of digital citizenship (DC) in diverse disciplinary areas, yet a common definition remains elusive. Different disciplines have varying conceptualizations of DC, but there are shared concerns and challenges that require interdisciplinary collaboration to advance research in this field.
A corollary to the exponential growth of digital technology is the increase in research interest in the construct of digital citizenship (DC) in diverse disciplinary areas. Although the term DC is used widely in research, scholars do not commit to a common definition. This integrative review investigates the conceptualizations and measurements of DC, across disciplines, in the extant literature. A systematic search of 11 databases identified a total of 350 unique items that contain digital citizenship in the title or keywords published by December 2018, with the majority published after 2010. Of these, 114 were peer-reviewed journal articles published in a wide range of discipline-specific venues, more than half of which were education-related. In-depth analyses show that each of the dominant conceptualizations of DC has been adopted by different disciplines, albeit with different popularities in adoption. Findings also revealed widely shared stakeholder concerns and research foci in DC research across the disciplines. However, there is a stark lack of empirical research on the young children, and an absence of commonly deployed research instruments in DC-related research. The present integrative review implicates the need for interdisciplinary collaboration for significant advances in DC research to address issues in policy and practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据