4.5 Article

Do not (Just) Think, But (Also) Feel!: Empirical Corroboration of Emotion-Involved Processing Hypothesis on Foreign Language Lexical Retention1

期刊

SAGE OPEN
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/21582440211032153

关键词

emotion; memory; levels of processing; cognitive psychology; semantic elaboration; vocabulary; foreign language; language education; pragmatism; SLA; EmAL; active-dynamic emotion; micro-level emotion; Emotion-Involved Processing Hypothesis

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAK [19K00899]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K00899] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Emotion plays important roles in learning and memory, with emotionally engaging processing found to facilitate linguistic processing and retention. Empirical study supports the Emotion-Involved Processing Hypothesis, suggesting that emotion-involved processing is a qualitatively distinct deeper level of processing compared to mere semantic processing.
Emotion plays important roles in learning, memory, and other cognitive processes; it does so not only in the form of macro-level emotion (e.g., salient affective states and self-reportable motivational currents) but also in the form of micro-level emotion (e.g., subtle feelings and linguistic attributes that are usually processed subconsciously without special attention). According to the Emotion-Involved Processing Hypothesis (EIPH), processing that draws attention to emotional aspects (EmInvProc+) is postulated as a deeper version of semantic processing which has cognitive advantage to facilitate linguistic processing and retention more than non-emotional semantic processing (EmInvProc-). This study empirically investigated whether the EIPH can be experimentally corroborated for learners of a distant foreign language (viz., Japanese learners of English). In the experiment, participants processed visually presented English words that were either positively or negatively valenced under different conditions, followed by the test session in which they engaged in memory tests. Two processing modes were compared (EmInvProc+ vs. EmInvProc-). The dependent variables were correct recall frequency, correct recognition frequency, and correct recognition reaction time. It was revealed that EmInvProc+ was more cognitively facilitatory in making stronger foreign language lexical memory traces than EmInvProc- for all the measures employed in the experiment, regarding both accuracy (correct response frequency) and fluency (correct response reaction time). Therefore, it is implied that EmInvProc+ can be regarded as a sui generis deeper level of processing that is qualitatively distinguishable from mere semantic processing, supporting the Emotion-Involved Processing Hypothesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据