4.6 Article

The antecedents of boredom in L2 classroom learning

期刊

SYSTEM
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102469

关键词

Boredom; Boredom antecedents; Psychological constructionist theory; L2 learning; Classroom-based study

资金

  1. School of Liberal Arts, King Mongkut's University of Technology. Thonburi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the antecedents of boredom among Thai university students in an English oral communication course. Through a whole-class survey and focus group interviews, nine thematic factors contributing to boredom were identified, including both internal learner factors and external classroom factors.
This classroom-based study investigated the antecedents of boredom among Thai university students enrolled in an English oral communication course. The primary data collection tool was a whole-class survey (n = 25) eliciting the learners' boredom experiences in a particular class over the course of seven weeks. Concurrently, focus group interviews (n = 5) were conducted five times to gain in-depth views about boredom and its antecedents in the L2 learning context in general, as well as the learners' boredom experiences in the class. A modified version of constant comparative analysis of the survey data yielded nine thematic factors as the antecedents of boredom, which were supported by the interview findings. Activity mismatch, lack of comprehension, insufficient L2 skills, task difficulty, input overload, and lack of ideas were shown to create conditions under which internal learner factors and external classroom factors were ill-balanced or mismatched, resulting in the emergence of boredom. Learners' physical fatigue, unfavorable appraisals of classroom tasks, and negative behaviors of classmates were also identified as the antecedents of boredom. Adopting a situated approach to exploring L2 learners' boredom, this study sheds light on the context-dependent view of how and why learners experience boredom through an emic perspective. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据