4.4 Article

Effects of Prevalent and Newly Diagnosed Arthritis on Changes in Perceived Physical Demands and Work Stress Among Older Workers: Results of a 3 Year Panel Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH
卷 34, 期 4-5, 页码 508-518

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/08982643211046427

关键词

aging workforce; work demands; work-related stress; impact of health on work; manual and non-manual workers

资金

  1. Network for Studies on Pension, Aging, and Retirement (Netspar)
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [453-14-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both prevalent and newly diagnosed arthritis were found to be associated with increased odds of perceived work stress and high physical demands. Particularly, manual workers with newly diagnosed arthritis showed a significant increase in odds of physical demands. Arthritis in three body extremities was differentially associated with increased odds of work stress and physical demands in manual and non-manual workers.
Objectives Examine the effects of prevalent and newly diagnosed arthritis on changes in perceived physical demands and general work stress. Methods Conditional change logistic regression models examined the strength of association between arthritis and perceived (1) work stress and (2) physical demands, using data from the NIDI Pension Panel Study (n = 2099). Results Prevalent and newly diagnosed arthritis were associated with increased odds of perceived work stress and high physical demands. Manual workers with newly diagnosed arthritis exhibited a 6.73-fold (95% CI = 2.87-15.77) increased odds of physical demands. Arthritis in three body extremities was differentially associated with increased odds of work stress and physical demands in manual and non-manual workers. Discussion Prevalent and incident arthritis were associated with changes in work stress and physical demands in older workers. Policies and workplace interventions to reduce stress and physical demands and improve workability in older workers with arthritis are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据