4.3 Article

Do Audiences Judge the Morality of Characters Relativistically? How Interdependence Affects Perceptions of Characters' Temporal Moral Descent

期刊

HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 4, 页码 338-363

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/hcr/hqab011

关键词

Affective Disposition Theory; Character Impression Formation Model; Character Interdependence Hypothesis; Moral Judgment; Character Categorization; Narrative; Media Entertainment; Experiment; Multi-level Model; Morally Ambiguous Characters; Moral Continuum Procedure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The simultaneous presence of two characters in a narrative polarizes participants' moral evaluations of character behavior, categorization of the characters as heroic/villainous, and character liking, substantiating the systematic effects of character interdependence on disposition formation.
In two pre-registered studies, we leveraged recent advances to disposition theory to examine whether character judgments are relative. We used a Pilot Study to develop a moral continuum of behaviors for a hypothetical television series. We referenced our established moral continuum to create behavioral sequences that represented two characters descending into immorality. We manipulated whether one or both characters were present in the narrative. The simultaneous presence of both characters polarized participants' moral evaluations of character behavior, categorization of the characters as heroic/villainous, and character liking. Our findings substantiate the systematic effects that character interdependence has on disposition formation. An improved understanding of narrative context can specify when between- and within-character comparisons occur and what effects character interdependence has on disposition theory's processes. We discuss how narrative schemas, character schemas, and character networks can serve as the elements for explicating the role of narrative context in disposition theory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据