4.3 Article

Pain sensitivity in patients with haemophilia following moderate aerobic exercise intervention

期刊

HAEMOPHILIA
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 886-893

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hae.13016

关键词

exercise; haemophilia; intervention; pain; pressure pain threshold; walking

资金

  1. Baxter Germany of the Haemophilia & Exercise Project (HEP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPhysical activity is influenced by pain and vice versa. Although studies recommend exercise therapy for patients with haemophilia (PwH), the influence of physical activity on the pain condition in PwH has not been investigated so far. AimAim of this study was to examine the effect of a treadmill intervention with self-chosen velocity on the acute pain sensitivity in PwH. Patients and methodsTwenty PwH [aged 24-58 years, moderate (n = 3) to severe (n = 17) haemophilia A (n = 17) or B (n = 3)] and 20 control subjects (aged 26-61 years) were included in this study. Eighteen PwH and all controls completed a treadmill intervention for 30 min. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in Newton (N) were measured at both the knees, ankles and elbows, sternum and forehead before (pre) and immediately after walking (post). ResultsPwH and controls walked with comparable speed (mean speed in km h(-1); PwH: 3.5, controls: 3.8), resulting in significantly different values of performance-related parameters such as heart rate (mean heart rate per minute; PwH: 102, controls: 86; P 0.01). Compared to baseline values, PPT remained unaltered at all landmarks in both groups after walking (e.g. pre/post in Newton; knee right: PwH: 63.1/63.0, controls: 93.8/93.8; left knee: PwH: 62.1/62.7, controls: 90.0/93.4), indicating a non-increasing pain condition. ConclusionFindings of unaltered PPT following moderate aerobic exercise showed initial evidence that PwH are able to perform an endurance exercise with self-chosen velocity for 30 min as recommended, without increasing the acute pain condition. By doing so, PwH can benefit from the positive effects of endurance exercise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据