4.7 Article

Has central environmental protection inspection improved air quality? Evidence from 291 Chinese cities

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106621

关键词

CEPI; Air quality; Campaign-oriented governance; Regular governance

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [18BZZ061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the impact of CEPI on air quality governance performance of Chinese local governments through a difference-in-differences approach and finds that CEPI significantly reduces pollutant concentrations and increases O3 concentration. Qualitative evidence also demonstrates that CEPI promotes environmental protection performance through campaign-oriented governance within the hierarchical system.
In recent years, central environmental protection inspection (CEPI) has been a major policy innovation in the field of Chinese environmental governance. Based on panel data on the daily air quality of Chinese cities, this paper mainly uses a difference-in-differences (DID) approach to conduct an empirical analysis of the relationship between CEPI and the air quality governance performance of Chinese local governments. There are large differences in the impact of CEPI on different air quality indicators. Controlling for a series of variables, we found that CEPI significantly reduced the air quality index (AQI) and concentrations of pollutants including PM2.5, PM10, SO2 and NO2 and that it significantly increased the concentration of O3; however, it had no significant effect on the concentration of CO. Furthermore, we complemented the quantitative analyses with qualitative evidence gathered from an in-depth interview. Based on the qualitative evidence collected, CEPI indeed plays a role in improving the environmental protection performance of regular environmental governance. Notably, CEPI achieved better and sustainable results in improving air quality through the underlying mechanism of promoting regular governance by campaign-oriented governance in the internal hierarchical system. This article not only provides a marginal empirical contribution by providing new quantitative evidence but also helps reveal the underlying mechanism of promoting regular governance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据