4.6 Article

Decreasing social contagion effects in diffusion cascades: Modeling message spreading on social media

期刊

TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS
卷 62, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101623

关键词

Information diffusion; Peer influence; Social contagion; Diffusion cascades; Homophily; Social network

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [19ZDA324]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of social contagion and homophily in retweeting behaviors on social media platforms. Results show that cascade depth is negatively associated with social contagion effects and positively associated with the effect of interest similarity on message sharing. Influence-based and homophily-driven diffusion operate differently in cascades with different diffusion structures.
Modeling retweeting behaviors is important for understanding and predicting how information spreads on social media platforms. The present study contributes to the literature by examining the decreasing social contagion and increasing homophily effects with the depth of diffusion cascades. To test the hypotheses, the study proposes a matching-on-followers method by combining choice and cascade models. More specifically, the study examines the impacts of interaction frequency, multiple exposures, and interest similarity between parent users and po-tential retweeters on the likelihood of retweeting. The study also incorporates the depth of diffusion cascades and network structures into the model. By using a random sample of original tweets, their retweets, and potential retweeters (N = 87,139), the study found that cascade depth is negatively associated with social contagion effects (interaction and multiple exposures) and positively associated with the effect of interest similarity on message sharing. These results indicate that influence-based and homophily-driven diffusion operate differently in cascades with different diffusion structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据