3.9 Review

Clinical Manifestations of Cuticular Drusen: Current Perspectives

期刊

CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 3877-3887

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S272345

关键词

cuticular drusen; spectral-domain optical coherence tomography; fundus autofluorescence; fluorescein angiography; multimodal imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cuticular drusen are a part of age-related macular degeneration, sharing high-risk polymorphisms with AMD. Multimodal imaging is essential to characterize these lesions, and while the clinical course may be relatively benign at early stages, the presence of large drusen in older patients may confer significant risk for macular neovascularization or geographic atrophy.
Cuticular drusen are part of the spectrum of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with particular clinical and multimodal imaging characteristics. This drusen sub population shares several high-risk single nucleotide polymorphisms with AMD. Despite this feature, they can manifest at a relatively young age, presenting with a female preponderance. Multimodal imaging is essential for characterizing such lesions, using a combination of color fundus photographs, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fluorescein angiography (FA), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF). The classic starry-sky pattern visible on FA and the typical central hypoautofluorescent lesion with hyperautofluorescent rim on FAF is considered the result of a central retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) erosion from these triangular elevations of the RPE-basal lamina. This finding may also be responsible for the typical choroidal hypertransmission appreciated through OCT. The clinical course of cuticular drusen may be relatively benign at early stages, with small drusen presenting at a young age. However, the presence of clinical phenotypes characterized by diffuse involvement and/or accompanying large drusen in patients older than 60 years may confer a significant risk for either macular neovascularization or geographic atrophy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据