4.6 Article

The future of sustainable supply chains: a novel tertiary-systematic methodology

期刊

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/SCM-08-2020-0383

关键词

Sustainability; Economic sustainability; Supply-chain management; Green supply chains; Triple bottom line; Sustainable supply chain; Sustainable supply chain management; Tertiary study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel tertiary systematic literature review approach with 94 secondary studies to analyze sustainable supply chain literature, providing an overview of research areas and perspectives adopted by previous researchers. The study also identifies research gaps and presents a prioritized agenda, along with a dynamic research compass for academicians and practitioners.
Purpose In recent years, economic, environmental and social sustainability has become one of the fastest-growing research fields. The number of primary and secondary papers addressing the triple bottom line is growing significantly, and the supply chain (SC) management discipline is in the same wave. Therefore, this paper aims to propose a novel tertiary systematic methodology to explore, aggregate, categorise and analyse the findings provided by secondary studies. Design/methodology/approach A novel tertiary systematic literature review approach, including 94 secondary studies, is proposed and used to analyse sustainable SC literature. The papers have been analysed using a research protocol, including descriptive and content analysis criteria. Findings This tertiary study does not only provide an overview of the literature on the topic of sustainability in SCs but also goes further, drawing up a categorisation of main research areas and research perspectives adopted by previous researchers. The paper also presents a rank of research gaps and an updated and a prioritised agenda. Originality/value This paper provides a novel interpretation of the research topics addressed by the secondary studies and presents a new classification of the literature gaps and their evolution. Finally, a dynamic research compass for both academicians and practitioners is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据