Easier, but not easy: Testing a grounded theory of breastfeeding experiences among women with larger birthweight infants

Objective Grounded Theory has previously been used to explore breastfeeding practices amongst average birthweight infants and these working hypotheses can be 'tested' in new contexts. A pre-existing Grounded Theory was applied to the context of women who gave birth to larger birthweight infants (>= 4,000 g) to understand whether perceptions and practices of infant feeding were distinct. Design A nested qualitative study analysed data from N = 10 women with a larger birthweight infant (>= 4,000 g). Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Grounded Theory methodology was used to analyse data. Results A pre-existing Grounded Theory of breastfeeding experiences derived from women with average birthweight infants did not hold true among women with larger birthweight infants. An alternative Grounded Theory was therefore proposed comprised of three discrete themes: Infant Ability to Breastfeed; Attenuating Maternal Concerns; and Reality of Breastfeeding. Conclusions Larger infant birthweight is potentially a protective factor against breastfeeding latch and lactation difficulties. It is associated with alleviating maternal concerns, helping to reduce disparities between expectations of breastfeeding and reality, but does not alleviate the demands breastfeeding places on women. Healthcare professionals help to attenuate women's concerns, however the support needs for women with larger birthweight infants may not differ from existing care recommendations.

Automated summary

This study examines whether the perceptions and practices of infant feeding are different among women who give birth to larger birthweight infants. The results suggest that larger infant birthweight may be a protective factor against breastfeeding difficulties, alleviating maternal concerns, but not reducing the demands of breastfeeding.