4.3 Review

The epigenomics of polycystic ovarian syndrome: from pathogenesis to clinical manifestations

期刊

GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 32, 期 12, 页码 942-946

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2016.1203409

关键词

Association analysis; clinical heterogeneity; comorbidity; DNA methylome; polycystic ovarian syndrome

资金

  1. Region of Southern Denmark [12/6629]
  2. Novo Nordisk Foundation Medical and Natural Sciences Research Grant [NNF13OC0007493]
  3. EFSD/CDS/Lilly Programme: Epigenomic profiling in Chinese identical twins discordant for type 2 diabetes
  4. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF13OC0007493] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a complex condition of ovarian dysfunction and metabolic abnormalities with widely varying clinical manifestations resulting from interference of the genome and the environment through integrative biological mechanisms with the emerging field of epigenetics offering an appealing tool for studying the nature and nurture of the disease. We review the current literature of epigenetic studies on PCOS from disease development to the association analysis of the DNA methylome and to exploratory studies on the molecular mechanisms of disease heterogeneity and comorbidity. Recent data based on profiling of the DNA methylome of PCOS in different tissues provided consistent molecular evidence in support of epidemiological findings on disease comorbidity suggesting a possible autoimmune basis in the pathogenesis of the disease. We show that the field of epigenetics and epigenomics could serve to link molecular regulatory mechanisms with disease development and disease manifestation which could contribute to PCOS prevention and treatment and eventually promote reproductive health in fertile age women. We summarize the up-to-date findings and discuss the implications of various studies and point to new avenues of research on PCOS in the rapidly developing field of epigenetics and epigenomics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据