4.7 Article

Towards a psychology of solar energy: Analyzing the effects of the Big Five personality traits on household solar energy adoption in Germany

期刊

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102087

关键词

Big Five; Renewable energy; Structural equation modeling; Consumer behavior; Household decision-making

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that consumers' personality traits can influence their adoption of residential photovoltaic systems through environmental concern and risk propensities. Additionally, the number of individuals involved in household decision-making process can change the way personality traits are mediated.
This research paper investigated the effect of consumers' Big Five personality traits on the adoption of residential photovoltaic systems in Germany. To account for different types or groups of households, a multigroup structural equation model with N = 9,281 individuals was analyzed using data from a nationwide, representative household panel. It could be shown that the ways in which personality traits are mediated through environmental concern and risk propensities change depending on whether there is a single household or if additional individuals are involved in the decision-making process. In the aggregated view, direct effects of extraversion could be found for households comprising only a couple. For other households with additional members, no direct effects were found. All five personality traits were mediated by risk preference while openness, agreeableness, and neuroticism were mediated by environmental concern. On the individual level, the examination revealed that the head of household's neuroticism and the partner's openness and extraversion showed significant effects on the purchase of a photovoltaic system - albeit with small effect sizes. The results provide important insights into how household decisions can be better understood in order to contribute to the energy-system transformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据