4.5 Review

A review of treatment methods for insensitive high explosive contaminated wastewater

期刊

HELIYON
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07438

关键词

Adsorption; Insensitive high explosives; DNAN; NTO; Wastewater treatment

资金

  1. Rheinmetall waffe munition Italia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insensitive high explosive materials (IHE) are increasingly used in the production of munitions, leading to contaminated wastewater that must be treated before discharge. While adsorption is a suitable treatment method, the high solubility of NTO may exceed the adsorptive capacity of carbon adsorption systems. Improvements to carbon adsorption systems are necessary to enhance adsorptive capacity and reduce costs.
Insensitive high explosive materials (IHE) such as 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO) and 2,4-dinitroanisole (DNAN) are increasingly being used in formulations of insensitive munitions alongside 1,3,5-trinitroperhydro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX). Load, assembly and packing (LAP) facilities that process munitions produce wastewater contaminated with IHE which must be treated before discharge. Some facilities can produce as much as 90,000 L of contaminated wastewater per day. In this review, methods of wastewater treatment are assessed in terms of their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats for their use in production of IHE munitions including their limitations and how they could be applied to industrial scale LAP facilities. Adsorption is identified as a suitable treatment method, however the high solubility of NTO, up to 16.6 g.L-1 which is 180 times higher that of TNT, has the potential to exceed the adsorptive capacity of carbon adsorption systems. The key properties of the adsorptive materials along the selection of adsorption models are highlighted and recommendations on how the limitations of carbon adsorption systems for IHE wastewater can be overcome are offered, including the modification of carbons to increase adsorptive capacity or reduce costs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据