4.5 Article

Synthesis, spectral characterization, lethal dose (LD50) and acute toxicity studies of 1,4-Bis(imidazolylazo)benzene (BIAB)

期刊

HELIYON
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07969

关键词

Imidazole; FE-SEM; XRD; Antibacterial; LD50; IC50

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structure of the new heterocyclic azo ligand BIAB was studied using various spectral techniques, and its antibacterial and antifungal activities were tested, showing higher antibacterial and slight antifungal effects.
The preparation and spectral identification of new heterocyclic azo ligand 1,4-Bis(imidazolylazo)benzene (BIAB) was prepared by reacting a diazonium chloride salt solution of 1,4-diaminobenzene with imidazole in alkaline ethanolic solution. Differing spectral techniques have been used to study the structure of the azo dye ligand (BIAB) such as Elemental analysis (C.H.N), H-1-NMR, Mass spectrum, UV-Vis, FT-IR, XRD, FE-SEM and thermal analysis (TGA-DTA). The pathogenic activities of the synthesized ligand (BIAB) was tested in vitro against the sensitive organisms Staphylococcus aureus (Gram-positive) and Escherichia coli (gram-negative) as antibacterial and Aspergillus Niger and Candida albicans as antifungal. The activity data show that the ligand (BIAB) higher antibacterial and slightly antifungus activity in comparison to the standard antibacterial (Amoxicillin) and antifungal (cycloheximide) drugs. The acute toxicity studies (LD50) was calculated using by Miller and Tainter methods (Estimated Probity Units) for the calculation of LD50. In this study, different doses (600, 1000, 1300, 1800, 2500 and 3600 mu g/ml) of the (BIAB) was administered orally to the different groups of mice. The results exhibited high acute toxicity with LD50 of 1020.23 mg/kg upon intraperitoneal administration in mice. The antioxidant properties of the ligand was examined using the DPPH radical scavenging technique. IC50 was also determined at 224.17 mu g/ml.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据