4.4 Article

The effects of resveratrol supplementation on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 114, 期 5, 页码 796-803

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114515002433

关键词

Resveratrol; Fatty liver; Inflammation; Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Clinical trials

资金

  1. Iran National Science Foundation [90008014]
  2. National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute [046468]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is usually associated with insulin resistance, central obesity, reduced glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertriacylglycerolaemia. The beneficial effects of resveratrol on metabolic disorders have been shown previously. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of resveratrol supplementation on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with NAFLD. In this randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial, fifty NAFLD patients were supplemented with either a 500-mg resveratrol capsule or a placebo capsule for 12 weeks. Both groups were advised to follow an energy-balanced diet and physical activity recommendations. resveratrol supplementation reduced alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and hepatic steatosis significantly more than placebo (P<0.05). BMI, waist circumference, serum aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, HDL-cholesterol and apo a(1) were reduced significantly in both groups (P<0.05); however, there were no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no significant changes in blood pressure, insulin resistance markers and TAG in either group (P>0.05). Our data have shown that 12-week supplementation of 500 mg resveratrol does not have any beneficial effect on anthropometric measurements, insulin resistance markers, lipid profile and blood pressure; however, it reduced ALT and hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据