4.6 Article

Progesterone receptor expression is associated with longer overall survival within high-grade histotypes of endometrial carcinoma: A Canadian high risk endometrial cancer consortium (CHREC) study

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 141, 期 3, 页码 559-563

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.008

关键词

Hormone receptor; ER; PR; Prognosis; Endometrial cancer; Highgrade; Serous; Endometrioid

资金

  1. Calgary Laboratory Services internal research support [RS10-536]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To assess the association of hormone receptor expression with outcome in high-grade endometrial carcinomas. Methods. This study included three sites participating in the Canadian High Risk Endometrial Cancer (CHREC) consortium. Sections from tissue microarrays containing cases with a diagnosis of endometrioid grade 3 (EC3) and endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC) were assessed for estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression by immunohistochemistry. Expression was considered present if >1% of tumor cell nuclei were labeled. Associations with overall survival were assessed. Results. ER expression was present in 168/216 (78%) of ED and 124/192 (65%) of ESC. PR expression was present in 148/212 (70%) of EC3 and 83/196 (42%) of ESC. PR expression was significantly associated with favorable overall survival in ED and ESC (log rank, p = 0.018 and p = 0.0024) but ER expression was not. PR expression was significantly associated with favorable overall survival in EC3 independent of age, stage, center and lymph-vascular invasion (hazard ratio = 0.457, 95% CI 0.257-0.811, p = 0.0075) as well as in stage I and II ESC (hazard ratio = 0.266, 95% CI 0.094-0.750, p = 0.0123). Conclusion. Our data provide support for the assessment of the PR expression status in ED and ESC. Future work will be required to determine how PR expression may be incorporated into management of patients with EC3 and ESC. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据