4.4 Article

The Heteronormativity Theory of Low Sexual Desire in Women Partnered with Men

期刊

ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR
卷 51, 期 1, 页码 391-415

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-02100-x

关键词

Sexual desire; Heteronormativity; Gender roles; Femininity; Household labor; Nurturance

资金

  1. Canada 150 Research Chairs program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces the heteronormativity theory of low sexual desire in women partnered with men, suggesting that gender inequities in society contribute to this issue. Through four hypotheses and predictions, it highlights inequitable divisions of household labor, blurring of partner and mother roles, objectification of women, and gender norms surrounding sexual initiation as contributing factors.
Low sexual desire in women partnered with men is typically presumed to be a problem-one that exists in women and encourages a research agenda on causation and treatment targeting women. In this paper, we present a distinct way forward for research on low sexual desire in women partnered with men that attends to a more structural explanation: heteronormativity. A heteronormative worldview assumes that relationships and structures are heterosexual, gender (usually conflated with sex) is binary and complementary, and gender roles fit within narrow bounds including nurturant labor for women. We propose the heteronormativity theory of low sexual desire in women partnered with men, arguing that heteronormative gender inequities are contributing factors. We outline four hypotheses and their predictions related to: inequitable divisions of household labor, blurring of partner and mother roles, objectification of women, and gender norms surrounding sexual initiation. We discuss some mechanisms-social, physiological, and otherwise-for the heteronormativity theory, especially related to stress, objectification, and nurturance. We close by noting some limitations of our paper and the ways that the heteronormativity theory of low sexual desire in women partnered with men provides a rigorous, generative, and empirical way forward.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据