4.7 Article

Towards a perspective of everyday urbanism in researching migrants in urban China

期刊

CITIES
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103461

关键词

Everyday urbanism; Everyday life; Migrant; Capitalist economy; Urban China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41871124, 41630635]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a theoretical intervention that applies a perspective of everyday urbanism to the study of internal migrants in urban China during the reform era. Drawing on Lefebvre's works and analyzing everyday urban practices, the paper reinterprets existing literature on migrants in China and proposes everyday urbanism as a new frontier for future research.
This paper presents one of the first theoretical interventions that apply a perspective of everyday urbanism to the research of (internal) migrants in reform-era urban China. Theoretically, the paper draws on two approaches that theorise the multifaceted relationships between everyday life and capitalist urbanization. The first, informed by Lefebvre's works, stresses the alienation of everyday life and the rationalisation of urban spaces, while asserting that everyday life contains the seeds of resistance to the colonising logics of capitalism. In the second approach, everyday urban practices are analysed in terms of a transversal logic to the state regime and the formal economy, or as the provisional intersections of heterogeneous social and material conditions that generate contingent outcomes and possibilities. Based on these theoretical premises, the paper develops a reinterpretation of existing literatures on migrants in China to see how a perspective of everyday urbanism enables us to rethink this field. The paper concludes by proposing everyday urbanism as a new frontier for research, and several ways in which future works can enrich our understandings of migrant lives, spaces and communities by engaging with this perspective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据