期刊
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 537-564出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-021-00485-6
关键词
Firm survival; Firm exit; Mode of exit; Innovation; Patents; Trademarks
资金
- Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore within the CRUI-CARE Agreement
- project ORGANIMPRE
- European Commission under the H2020 program [822781]
- H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [822781] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme
This study explores the relationship between firm characteristics, innovation capabilities, and survival probabilities, specifically looking at involuntary exit and exit by M&A. The role of innovation and intellectual property differ in their significance depending on the exit route: patents are more effective against involuntary exit, while trademarks are more relevant for M&A. Higher productivity reduces the likelihood of involuntary exit but increases the chances of being a target for M&A.
This work investigates the relationship between the characteristics and survival probabilities of firms, distinguishing between involuntary firm exit and exit by merger and acquisition (M&A). More in detail, we study how, and to what extent, innovation capabilities, as proxied by patents and trademarks, are able to shape, together with standard performance variables, the observed dynamics at the firm level. By using comprehensive data on Italian firms from business registers, we separate the administrative procedures leading to involuntary exit from those ending up with an event of M&A. We find that while higher productivity is associated with a lower probability of involuntary exit, productivity increases the chances of being the target for M&A. As far as intellectual property instruments are concerned, they tend to reduce the probability of both involuntary exit and M&A. However, the relative importance of the two instruments differs according to the exit route: patents are more relevant than trademarks in preventing involuntary exit, while the opposite is true for M&A. Plain English Summary We investigate firm's exit after a crisis. Overall innovation plays a positive role, but the relative importance of IP depends on the exit route: patents are more relevant than trademarks against involuntary exit, while the opposite is true for M&A. We resort to the virtual universe of Italian limited liability firms from manufacturing, trade, and service to investigate the determinants of firm survival over the period 2010-2014. We scrutinize detailed administrative data on significant events occurring to firms to distinguish between events leading to involuntary exit and to M&A. In addition to the evidence on innovation, our results show that higher productivity decreases the probability of involuntary exit, yet productivity increases the chances of being the target for M&A. Taken together, these findings warn against a simplistic perspective on exit: the role of innovation and firm characteristics heavily depends on the exit route.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据