4.3 Article

Migrants working for migrants: dependence and discourse in Chinese-owned small commercial businesses in South Africa

期刊

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2021.1949625

关键词

Chinese migrant businesses; migrants; power and resistance; responsible autonomy; South Africa

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of Chin a (Key Program Scheme) [NSFC 71832012]
  2. Monash Business School Inter disciplinary Research Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the lack of research, findings suggest that employment relations in small Chinese migrant businesses in South Africa are mainly transactional and adversarial, with occasional symbiotic accommodations with third-country undocumented immigrant workers and pockets of responsible autonomy. Material imbalances of power are somewhat alleviated by workers' local language skills and cultural familiarity, allowing them to act as intermediaries with clients and other stakeholders. However, this autonomy is limited due to the precarious nature of employment and workers' immigration status.
The nature of work and employment relations of small Chinese migrant businesses in South Africa remains largely under-researched, despite the significant growth of these businesses since the 2000s. Based on 90 interviews with Chinese business owners and their African workers, we found that, although employment relations were largely transactional and adversarial, they sometimes also incorporated symbiotic accommodations with third-country undocumented immigrant workers and pockets of de facto responsible autonomy. Material imbalances of power were notably alleviated through workers' superior local language skills and cultural familiarity, enabling them to carve out space as intermediaries with customers and other local stakeholders to counter the power of employers. However, this autonomy is relatively small in scope, in large part due to the precarious nature of the employment and the workers' immigration status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据