4.4 Article

Visual Working Memory Items Drift Apart Due to Active, Not Passive, Maintenance

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL
卷 150, 期 12, 页码 2506-2524

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/xge0000890

关键词

working memory; mnemonic bias; repulsion bias; attentional competition; hierarchical bayesian mixture model

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF DGE-1343012, BCS-1848939, BCS-1632296]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01-EY025648]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has found that stronger repulsion bias occurs with longer working memory delays, particularly when items are actively maintained, indicating that mnemonic repulsion bias is an ongoing phenomenon dependent on attention to internally maintained memory items. This supports theories of working memory where items are represented interdependently and highlights how stronger attention to working memory items during maintenance can increase repulsion bias between them.
How are humans capable of maintaining detailed representations of visual items in memory? When required to make fine discriminations, we sometimes implicitly differentiate memory representations away from each other to reduce interitem confusion. However, this separation of representations can inadvertently lead memories to be recalled as biased away from other memory items, a phenomenon termed repulsion bias. Using a nonretinotopically specific working memory paradigm, we found stronger repulsion bias with longer working memory delays, but only when items were actively maintained. These results suggest that (a) repulsion bias can reflect a mnemonic phenomenon, distinct from perceptually driven observations of repulsion bias; and (b) mnemonic repulsion bias is ongoing during maintenance and dependent on attention to internally maintained memory items. These results support theories of working memory where items are represented interdependently and further reveals contexts where stronger attention to working memory items during maintenance increases repulsion bias between them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据