4.4 Article

Vitamin S: Why Is Social Contact, Even With Strangers, So Important to Well-Being?

期刊

CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 267-273

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/09637214211002538

关键词

human cooperation; weak ties; strangers; COVID-19; well-being

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article discusses the benefits of social contact with acquaintances and strangers, presenting three propositions to support this conclusion: most interaction situations with strangers are benign, most strangers are benign, and most interactions with strangers enhance well-being. Studies show that interactions with strangers often involve low conflict of interest and high levels of cooperation, which can lead to short-term happiness even from subtle interactions.
Even before COVID-19, it was well known in psychological science that people's well-being is strongly served by the quality of their close relationships. But is well-being also served by social contact with people who are known less well? In this article, we discuss three propositions that support the conclusion that the benefits of social contact also derive from interactions with acquaintances and even strangers. The propositions state that most interaction situations with strangers are benign (Proposition 1), that most strangers are benign (Proposition 2), and that most interactions with strangers enhance well-being (Proposition 3). These propositions are supported, first, by recent research designed to illuminate the primary features of interaction situations. This research shows that situations with strangers often represent low conflict of interest. Also, in interactions with strangers, most people exhibit high levels of low-cost cooperation (social mindfulness) and, if the need is urgent, high levels of high-cost helping. We close by sharing research examples showing that even very subtle interactions with strangers yield short-term happiness. Broader implications for COVID-19 and urbanization are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据