期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY
卷 127, 期 1, 页码 1-59出版社
UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/714915
关键词
-
类别
The debates within the women's liberation movement regarding the cause of women's oppression and the best approach to change it are complex and stable differences in interpretation, more influenced by place than by political moment. Through network analysis, computational text analysis, and qualitative interpretation, the author explores how political logics in different locations contribute to durable differences within movement discourse.
The women's liberation movement hotly debated both the cause of women's oppression and the best approach to changing it. When treated as a moment within 1960s political polarization, these debates can seem esoteric and arbitrary. When examined across the longue duree, the debates prove to reflect complex and stable differences in interpretation that were tied to place more than to the political moment. Using a combination of network analysis, computational text analysis, and qualitative interpretation, the author examines women's movement discourses across the first and second waves of activism and between two sites, New York City and Chicago. Place, she finds, serves to capture differences in political logics that generate durable differences within movement discourse.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据