4.7 Article

The impact of short-term pricing on flexible generation investments in electricity markets

期刊

ENERGY ECONOMICS
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105213

关键词

Electricity markets; Pricing schemes; Market incentives; Flexibility; Renewable energy

资金

  1. CONICYT/PIA/BASAL [AFB180003]
  2. [CONICYT/FONDECYT/11170630]
  3. [CONICYT/FONDECYT/1190460]
  4. [CONICYT/FONDAP/15110019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extensive growth of variable renewable energy integration presents challenges for power systems and markets, requiring flexibility to adapt to changes. Studies on short-term market pricing schemes show the importance of including flexibility features to incentivize agents to meet systemic flexibility requirements.
The massive growth in the integration of variable renewable energy sources is producing several challenges in the operation of power systems and its associated markets. In this context, flexibility has become a critical attribute to allow the system to react to changes in generation or demand levels. Thus, it is critical for market signals at both short and long term scales to include flexibility features, to align agents' incentives with systemic flexibility requirements. In this paper, different pricing schemes for short-term markets are studied, based on various relaxations of the unit commitment problem, including convex-hull approximations, with the aim of representing operational flexibility requirements in a more explicit way. Extensive simulations illustrate the performance of the proposed schemes, as compared to conventional ones, in terms of the capability of the system to properly incentivize flexibility attributes, resulting in better agents' cost recovery and more variable renewable energy utilization. The results show that short-term pricing schemes considered improve the long-term signals for flexible investments but additional changes to market design are still required. Thus, there is a need to revisit historical practices for pricing rules by incorporating additional flexibility-related attributes into them. Several alternatives are discussed and policy recommendations based on these considerations are provided. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据