4.7 Article

Environmental regulation and corporate tax avoidance: A quasi-natural experiment based on the eleventh Five-Year Plan in China

期刊

ENERGY ECONOMICS
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105312

关键词

Environmental regulation; Sustainable development; Corporate tax avoidance; Corporate social responsibility; China

资金

  1. China National Social Science Fund [19BJY008]
  2. Humanities and Social Science Fund Project of Ministry of Education in China [18YJA790055]
  3. Project of UK-China Cooperation on Climate Change Risk Assessment [PF3051 CHWS3HBUE YR1]
  4. Youth Academic Team in Humanities and Social Sciences of Wuhan University [4103-413100001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental regulation has a significant positive effect on corporate tax avoidance, especially for private firms and firms in the eastern region of China. The channels identified include operating risks and financing constraints.
Taking the 11th Five-Year Plan in China as a quasi-natural experiment, this paper explores the impact of environmental regulation on corporate tax avoidance based on firm-level data and the difference-in-difference-in -differences (DDD) method. We find that: (1) Environmental regulation has a significant positive effect on corporate tax avoidance, and several robustness checks confirm our findings; (2) Heterogeneity analysis show that this effects are more significant for private firms and for firms in the regions with less fiscal stress and that in the east part of China; (3) Two channels identified are the operating risks and financing constraints; (4) Further analysis show that the 11th Five-Year Plan has spillover effects on firms in low-emission industries. The increased tax avoidance of firms in high-emission industries contributes to a raised tax burden on firms in low-emission industries. Our study provides implications for the formulation of environmental policies in developing countries (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据