4.4 Article

Lean rats gained more body weight than obese ones from a high-fibre diet

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 114, 期 8, 页码 1188-1194

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114515002858

关键词

Obesity; Soyabean fibre; Energy harvest; Gut microbiota; Bacteroidetes; Firmicutes

资金

  1. funds of the Chinese National Natural Science Funds [31271849]
  2. Nansha District Scientific and Technological Projects [2014GG-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is controversy over previous findings that a high ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteriodetes helps obese animals harvest energy from the diet. To further investigate the relationship between microbial composition and energy harvest, microbial adaptation to diet and time should be considered. In this study, lean and obese rats were successfully induced with low-fat and high-fat diets. An 8-week high soyabean fibre (HSF)-containing diet was then fed to investigate the interaction between the diet and the rats' gut microbiota, as well as their influence on rats' growth. Rats' body weight (BW) was recorded weekly; their plasma lipids and their gut microbiota at week 11, 15 and 19 were analysed. After the consumption of the HSF diet, BW of lean rats increased significantly (P<0.05), but no significant alteration in BW was found in obese rats. The average content of plasma cholesterol was lowered and that of TAG was upgraded in both the groups when fed the HSF diet. There was no significant difference observed at each period between lean and obese rats. In the group of lean rats, the diversity of gut microbiota was elevated strongly (P<0.01), and bacteria from phylum Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were both increased largely (P<0.01); however, the bacterial diversity and composition in obese rats were less altered after the HSF diet control. In conclusion, the increased Firmicutes and Bacteriodetes might relate to lean rats' higher BW gain; 'obese microbiota' could not help the hosts harvest more energy from the HSF diet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据