4.6 Article

The Psychological Burden of the COVID-19 Pandemic Is Associated With Antisystemic Attitudes and Political Violence

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 32, 期 9, 页码 1391-1403

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/09567976211031847

关键词

antisystemic attitudes; Black Lives Matter; COVID-19; police brutality; political activism; political violence; protest; open data; open materials; preregistered

资金

  1. Carlsbergfondet [CF20-0044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic has consequences for people's political attitudes and behavior, with perceived burden related to antisystemic attitudes and intentions to engage in political violence. In the United States, the burden of COVID-19 is also associated with violence during Black Lives Matter protests. There is less robust evidence linking perceived burden to peaceful activism.
What are the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic for people's political attitudes and behavior? We tested, specifically, whether the psychological burden of the COVID-19 pandemic relates to antisystemic attitudes (dissatisfaction with the fundamental social and political order), peaceful political activism, and political violence. Nationally representative two-wave panel data were collected via online surveys of adults in the United States, Denmark, Italy, and Hungary (ns = 6,131 and 4,568 in Waves 1 and 2, respectively). Overall, levels of antisystemic attitudes were low, and only a small share of interviewees reported behavioral intentions to participate in and actual participation in political violence. However, preregistered analyses indicated that perceived COVID-19 burden was associated with antisystemic attitudes and intentions to engage in political violence. In the United States, the burden of COVID-19 was also associated with self-reported engagement in violence surrounding the Black Lives Matter protests and counterprotests. We found less robust evidence that perceived COVID-19 burden was associated with peaceful activism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据