4.7 Article

Exploring the inverted-U relationship between gamification achievement and health management performance

期刊

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106805

关键词

Gamification; Health management; Achievement mechanism; Social network; Health condition

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71901073, 72001049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found an inverted-U relationship between achievement level and health management performance, with social network size and health condition negatively moderating this relationship.
How to improve users' health management performance is an important challenge for practitioners of digital health platforms. Gamification is considered a potential method to encourage individuals to engage in health management and improve the level of their health management performance. To better understand the role of gamification in the health management context, this study investigates the influence of the achievement mechanism on the health management performance, as well as the moderating effects of social network and health condition. This study collected 1554 users' data (54.4% female and 45.6% male, age: 18-35) from an online health community in China and built a regression model combined with the U test estimation algorithm to examine the research hypotheses. The results of the empirical model show an inverted-U relationship exists between level of achievement and the level of health management performance. Moreover, our research shows that the size of the social network and the health condition negatively moderate the inverted-U relationship. These findings facilitate an understanding of the role of gamification in the health management context. Further, the study contributes to goal setting theory and provides new insights and suggestions for users and designers of health management platforms and online health communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据