4.7 Article

A broad overview of interactive digital marketing: A bibliometric network analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 183-195

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.061

关键词

Digital marketing; Interactive marketing; Mobile marketing; e-marketing; e-advertising; e-Word-of-mouth

类别

资金

  1. UNLV Lee Business School
  2. Harold & Muriel Berkman Charitable Foundation, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The widespread adoption of digital technologies and online social networks has transformed marketing strategies, enabling more objective, relational, and interactive techniques. Innovative devices and data-driven marketing in digital advertising offer wider and more efficient reach. Research on interactive digital marketing is tracked through computational techniques, contributing to this interdisciplinary field.
The widespread adoption of digital technologies and online social networks has revolutionized the way marketers engage with consumers. By deploying various digital platforms and information and communication technology (ICT) tools (e.g., smartphones, social media, mobile apps, electronic billboards, etc.), organizations can compete with more objective, relational, and interactive marketing techniques. The adoption of innovative devices and data-driven marketing, specifically in digital advertising, provides both a wide and efficient reach. Consequently, digital marketing (DM) triggered the creation of more informed, empowered, and connected groups of customers in both the real and virtual worlds. This paper tracks research dynamics in interactive digital marketing by identifying the stages of evolution of major topics, articles, citation and co-citation networks, using various computational techniques, including growth curve analysis and citation network analysis of bibliometric information. Finally, the study offers contributions to the field of interactive digital marketing as an international and interdisciplinary field of research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据