The Validity of Physiological Measures to Identify Differences in Intrinsic Cognitive Load

A sample of 33 experiments was extracted from the Web-of-Science database over a 5-year period (2016-2020) that used physiological measures to measure intrinsic cognitive load. Only studies that required participants to solve tasks of varying complexities using a within-subjects design were included. The sample identified a number of different physiological measures obtained by recording signals from four main body categories (heart and lungs, eyes, skin, and brain), as well as subjective measures. The overall validity of the measures was assessed by examining construct validity and sensitivity. It was found that the vast majority of physiological measures had some level of validity, but varied considerably in sensitivity to detect subtle changes in intrinsic cognitive load. Validity was also influenced by the type of task. Eye-measures were found to be the most sensitive followed by the heart and lungs, skin, and brain. However, subjective measures had the highest levels of validity. It is concluded that a combination of physiological and subjective measures is most effective in detecting changes in intrinsic cognitive load.

Automated summary

The study identified that eye-measures were the most sensitive in detecting changes in intrinsic cognitive load, followed by heart and lungs, skin, and brain measures, with subjective measures having the highest levels of validity. Therefore, a combination of physiological and subjective measures is concluded to be the most effective in detecting changes in intrinsic cognitive load.