4.7 Article

N95 respirator decontamination: a study in reusability

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY ADVANCES
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100148

关键词

Decontamination; Respirator; Vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP); UV; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; N95; Reuse

资金

  1. Temasek Foundation
  2. Agency of Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR)
  3. National Environment Agency, Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study systematically evaluated five N95 respirator decontamination methods using VHP or UVC radiation, and found that four methods effectively inactivated Cardiovirus and bacteria after multiple cycles, achieving respirator regeneration and reuse.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had caused a severe depletion of the worldwide supply of N95 respirators. The development of methods to effectively decontaminate N95 respirators while maintaining their integrity is crucial for respirator regeneration and reuse. In this study, we systematically evaluated five respirator decontamination methods using vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP) or ultraviolet (254 nm wavelength, UVC) radiation. Through testing the bioburden, filtration, fluid resistance, and fit (shape) of the decontaminated respirators, we found that the decontamination methods using BioQuell VHP, custom VHP container, Steris VHP, and Sterrad VHP effectively inactivated Cardiovirus (3-log(10) reduction) and bacteria (6-log(10) reduction) without compromising the respirator integrity after 2-15 cycles. Hope UVC system was capable of inactivating Cardiovirus (3-log(10) reduction) but exhibited relatively poorer bactericidal activity. These methods are capable of decontaminating 10 -1000 respirators per batch with varied decontamination times (10-200 min). Our findings show that N95 respirators treated by the previously mentioned decontamination methods are safe and effective for reuse by industry, laboratories, and hospitals. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据