4.3 Article

Nutrition in Cancer Care: A Brief, Practical Guide With a Focus on Clinical Practice

期刊

JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 442-+

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/OP.20.00704

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This overview aims to provide evidence-based practical guidance regarding nutritional issues for patients with cancer, emphasizing the crucial role nutrition plays in cancer care. It highlights the lack of focus on nutrition among oncologists due to insufficient training and underestimation of its importance, while also summarizing challenges, recommendations, and clinical scenarios to bridge the gap between guidelines and practice.
This overview aims to create an understanding of the nutritional issues concerning patients with cancer and provide evidence-based practical guidance to healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses, and dietitians), caregivers, and all others involved in the care of patients with cancer. The focus of this paper is therefore on providing a simple guide for daily clinical practice. The theoretical background and in-depth comprehensive reviews of malnutrition are described elsewhere. Nutrition plays a crucial role in cancer care. It affects treatment tolerability, outcomes, and quality of life. However, a focus on nutrition is still lacking among oncologists because of insufficient training in nutrition topics received during graduate and postgraduate training and an underestimation of its importance. The consequences of the disease and its treatment, such as anorexia-sarcopenia-cachexia, are therefore still often overlooked, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. The authors have summarized the most important challenges, evidence-based recommendations, and common clinical scenarios to bridge the gap between comprehensive guidelines and clinical practice, where brief concrete advice is preferred to systematic reviews. Furthermore, an easy applicable overview is provided, which can be used as a guide during daily routines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据