4.3 Article

Dealing with small samples in football research

期刊

SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN FOOTBALL
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 389-397

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/24733938.2021.1978106

关键词

Study design; statistics; statistical power; underpowered; winners curse; small population

资金

  1. German Institute of Sports Science [ZMV I4 -080511/19-20]
  2. German Institute of Sport Science [ZMV I4 -080511/19-20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In football research, small sample sizes can lead to issues such as inconclusive results and overestimation of effect sizes. Therefore, ensuring the target sample size is met is crucial.
In football research, 'small' trials with low statistical power are common. On the elite level, the inherently low number of participants obviously conflicts with the relevance of even tiny effects. However, general characteristics of football also contribute (e.g. multifactorially influenced and/or complex outcomes). Importantly, small sample sizes are problematic regardless of the study outcome with issues ranging from inconclusive results and low precision to unrepeatable 'discoveries' and overestimation of effect sizes. Therefore, meeting the calculated, target sample size is the first priority. If a suboptimal sample size must be accepted, a range of tools can improve insights. To begin with, some general aspects of data collection and analysis become more important and should be optimally implemented (e.g. reliability of measures). Building on this foundation, specific amendments are available on the levels of data collection (e.g. aggregated single-subject designs) and data analysis (e.g. Bayesian methods). The present commentary aims to give an overview of selected, practical tools for dealing with small sample sizes in football research and provide recommendations for their application in scenarios typical for the field. Importantly, versatility and adaptability are mirrored by the need for utmost transparency including a predetermined (ideally preregistered) study plan. Collaboration or counselling with an expert statistician is strongly encouraged.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据