Metric Evaluation of Reliability and Transparency of the Videos About Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgery in the Online Platforms: Assessment of YouTube Videos' Content

Objective: To evaluate the quality and reliability of carpal tunnel syndrome surgery videos on YouTube. Methods: A keyword set of carpal tunnel syndrome surgery was searched on YouTube. The DISCERN scoring system, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) scoring system, and Health on the Net (HON) ranking systems were used to evaluate the quality and reliability of the first 50 videos appeared in the search results. The characteristics of each video, such as the number of likes, dislikes and views, upload days, video length, and the uploader, were collected retrospectively. The relationships between the video quality and these factors were investigated statistically. Results: All of the featured videos sorted were found to be of poor content (mean DISCERN score [n= 1.71 of 5], mean JAMA score [n= 1.76 of 4], mean HON score [n= 5.65 of 16]). Yet, DISCERN scores of the videos uploaded by medical centers were higher than that of the others (p= 0.022). No relationship was detected between the other variables and video quality. Conclusion: Healthcare professionals and organizations should be more cautious when recording and uploading a video to the online platforms. As those videos could reach a wide audience, their content should provide more information about possible complications of a treatment and other treatment modalities.

Automated summary

The study evaluated the quality and reliability of carpal tunnel syndrome surgery videos on YouTube and found that most videos were of poor content. However, videos uploaded by medical centers had higher quality scores. There was no significant relationship between video quality and other variables such as likes, dislikes, or views.