4.8 Article

Freestanding germanene nanosheets for rapid degradation and photothermal conversion

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY NANO
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtnano.2021.100119

关键词

Germanene; Two-dimensional nanosheets; Rapid biodegradation; Photothermal conversion; Nanomedicine

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52002391, 21835007]
  2. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences [ZDBS-LY-SLH029]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M660098]
  4. Science Foundation for Youth Scholar of State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructures [SKL201906]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional biodegradable germanene nanosheets with excellent biocompatibility and degradability have been synthesized for potential applications in photo-triggered therapeutics and photoacoustic diagnostic imaging in biomedicine.
Germanium plays an important role in biomedical utilizations, mainly for inducing erythropoietic, antimicrobial, antiviral, antimutagenic, and immunomodulating effects. The biological applications of organic germanium have been gradually reported in recent years; however, the intrinsic poor biodegradation of most inorganic nanomaterials prevent their further in vivo applications and clinical translation in biomedicine. Herein, two-dimensional (2D) quasi-freestanding and fully biodegradable germanene nanosheets have been synthesized from Zintl-phase ladder-shaped binary germanide (CaGe2), which feature intriguing physiochemical properties for photo-triggered therapeutics and photoacoustic diagnostic imaging, as well as excellent biocompatibility, in addition to the excellent degradability compared with other typical 2D biomaterials. This work presents a novel type of 2D structured inorganic germanium biomaterial featuring attractive biomedical multifunctionalities, which is expected to benefit clinical and translational medicine. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据