4.5 Article

Edge AI prospect using the NeuroEdge computing system: Introducing a novel neuromorphic technology

期刊

ICT EXPRESS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 152-157

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.icte.2021.05.003

关键词

Edge device; Embedded systems; Edge AI; Neuromorphic technology; Training time

资金

  1. MSIT, South Korea, under the Grand Information Technology Research Center support program [IITP-2020-2020-0-01612]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, South Korea [2018R1A6A1A03024003, 2019R1I1A1A01063895]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a test bed demonstration of NeuroEdge computing for face recognition using a novel neuromorphic chip (NM500). The neuromorphic technology offers scalability and consistent recognition time, making it advantageous for real-time networked systems. The results showed that using neuromorphic technology can save training time and does not require a large dataset for effective training.
This paper presents a test bed demonstration of NeuroEdge computing for face recognition using a novel neuromorphic chip-NM500. First, a general description and important specifications of the NM500 are presented. Second, a face recognition test-bed case study is used to demonstrate the efficacy and efficiency of the chip. Neuromorphic technology offers scalability and consistent recognition time, which is required by real-time networked systems, and presents a considerable advantage for real-time computations, making them virtually independent of the dataset size. In this study, intelligent edge computing technology was introduced using NeuroEdge. The performance was verified using a face recognition test. The results demonstrated that using neuromorphic technology, such as the NM500 chip, saves the time needed for training systems and does not impose the burden of requiring many datasets for effective training. (C) 2021 The Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences (KICS). Publishing Services by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据