4.5 Article

Vibration-controlled Transient Elastography for Assessment of Liver Fibrosis at a USA Academic Medical Center

期刊

出版社

XIA & HE PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00188

关键词

Chronic liver disease; Cirrhosis; Hepatitis; Liver histopathology; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

资金

  1. Scholarly Projects Program at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the use of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) for assessing liver fibrosis in a clinical setting, finding that VCTE is reliable for ruling out cirrhosis but caution is needed when diagnosing cirrhosis due to its low positive predictive value. In some cases, the fibrosis stage determined by VCTE differed significantly from that determined by liver biopsy.
Background and Aims: Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is a noninvasive tool that uses liver stiffness measurement (LSM) to assess fibrosis. Since real-life data during everyday clinical practice in the USA are lacking, we describe the patterns of use and diagnostic performance of VCTE in patients at an academic medical center in New York City. Methods: Patients who received VCTE scans were included if liver biopsy was performed within 1 year. Diagnostic performance of VCTE in differentiating dichotomized fibrosis stages was assessed via area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC). Fibrosis stage determined from VCTE LSM was compared to liver biopsy. Results: Of 109 patients, 49 had nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, 16 chronic hepatitis C, 15 congestive hepatopathy, and 22 at least two etiologies. AUROC was 0.90 for differentiating cirrhosis (stage 4) with a positive predictive value (PPV) range of 0.28 to 0.45 and negative predictive value range of 0.96 to 0.98. For 31 (32%) patients, VCTE fibrosis stage was at least two stages higher than liver biopsy fibrosis stage. Thirteen of thirty-five patients considered to have cirrhosis by VCTE had stage 0 to 2 and 12 stage 3 fibrosis on liver biopsy. Conclusions: VCTE has reasonable diagnostic accuracy and is reliable at ruling out cirrhosis. However, because of its low PPV, caution must be exercised when used to diagnose cirrhosis, as misdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary health care interventions. In routine practice, VTCE is also sometimes performed for disease etiologies for which it has not been robustly validated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据