4.8 Article

Catalytic graphitization of bacterial cellulose-derived carbon nanofibers for stable and enhanced anodic performance of lithium-ion batteries

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY CHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100439

关键词

Bacterial cellulose; Carbon nanofibers; Catalytic graphitization; Lithium-ion batteries; Hard carbon; In situ modification

资金

  1. SERB [CRG/2018/004441]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adding an iron catalyst to modify the fermentation media used for bacterial cellulose production enhances the performance of carbon nanofibers, showing potential for better application in lithium-ion batteries.
Bacterial cellulose (BC) produced through microbial fermentation has emerged as a viable precursor for carbon nanofibers (CNF) anode used in lithium-ion batteries. However, the low capacity and fading behavior of BC-derived CNFs render their usage in its pure form. Tuning the microstructure of CNFs in such cases plays an essential role in overcoming these negative ramifications and improves battery performance. In this study, the fermentation media used for BC production is modified by the addition of an iron catalyst, which can induce graphitization in the derived CNFs. Pure BC and catalyst-incorporated BC are pyrolyzed at 900 degrees C and 1800 degrees C to obtain CNFs, and the properties of derived CNFs are compared for understanding the role of incorporated catalyst. The structural, morphological, and electrochemical properties of CNFs are analyzed through X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, impedance spectroscopy, galvanostatic charge-discharge studies, and cyclic voltammogram studies. By possessing a higher graphitic content, catalyst-incorporated BC-derived CNFs exhibit an enhanced rate performance with a reversible capacity of 529 mAh g(-1) after 100 continuous charge/discharge cycles at a current density of 0.2C. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据