4.6 Article

Application of nature-inspired algorithms and artificial neural network in waterflooding well control optimization

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13202-021-01199-x

关键词

Waterflooding optimization; Machine learning; Artificial neural network; Data-driven proxy modeling; Nature-inspired algorithms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using machine learning methods, data-driven proxy models were established to maximize the net present value of a waterflooding process by adjusting well control injection rates. The training results were highly accurate, with optimization results almost matching those of the reservoir simulator, and computational costs were significantly reduced.
With the aid of machine learning method, namely artificial neural networks, we established data-driven proxy models that could be utilized to maximize the net present value of a waterflooding process by adjusting the well control injection rates over a production period. These data-driven proxies were maneuvered on two different case studies, which included a synthetic 2D reservoir model and a 3D reservoir model (the Egg Model). Regarding the algorithms, we applied two different nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms, i.e., particle swarm optimization and grey wolf optimization, to perform the optimization task. Pertaining to the development of the proxy models, we demonstrated that the training and blind validation results were excellent (with coefficient of determination, R-2 being about 0.99). For both case studies and the optimization algorithms employed, the optimization results obtained using the proxy models were all within 5% error (satisfied level of accuracy) compared with reservoir simulator. These results confirm the usefulness of the methodology in developing the proxy models. Besides that, the computational cost of optimization was significantly reduced using the proxies. This further highlights the significant benefits of employing the proxy models for practical use despite being subject to a few constraints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据