4.4 Article

Bismuthonium- and pyrylium-based radical induced cationic frontal polymerization of epoxides

期刊

JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 59, 期 16, 页码 1841-1854

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pol.20210196

关键词

BADGE; bismuthonium; cationic polymerization; frontal polymerization; pyrylium; RICFP; TPED

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cationic polymerization is a powerful tool for various applications such as adhesive, coating, composite, and bulk material production. Epoxy-based systems are commonly used due to their high reactivity and versatility. The introduction of radical induced cationic frontal polymerization (RICFP) has provided a more efficient pathway for curing epoxides, with bismuth-based initiator systems showing advantages in terms of pot life and reactivity.
Cationic polymerization is a powerful tool when it comes to adhesive, coating, composite, and bulk material production. A variety of monomers is suitable for this technique, however epoxy-based systems are used in many applications, due to their high reactivity and versatility. With the introduction of the radical induced cationic frontal polymerization (RICFP), an even more efficient pathway to cure epoxides and with it a variety of new applications was obtained. The prevailing initiator class for RICFP applications is the iodonium salt. Decades of research and fine-tuning of the formulations lead to a highly effective and versatile initiator system. With the introduction of bismuth- and oxygen-based onium salts for frontal polymerization, the well-known iodonium salt is challenged. Bismuthonium hexafluoroantimonates shows high rate of polymerization and conversions of 84% in an epoxy system. The advantage of bismuthonium-based systems is the pot life of the formulations, which can be cured at the press of a button. In this study, iodonium salts last around 3 days before a significant viscosity increase is measured, while the bismuthonium initiator lasts over 10 times as long with no significant drop in reactivity or frontal velocity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据