4.4 Article

Comparison of the reactivity of isomeric 2H- and 3H-naphthopyran mechanophores

期刊

JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 59, 期 21, 页码 2537-2544

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pol.20210417

关键词

mechanophore; naphthopyran; Polymer mechanochemistry

资金

  1. California Institute of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study directly compares the reactivity of two isomeric naphthopyrans in solution and solid materials, finding that the 2H-naphthopyran produces a dye with slower reversion rate. By investigating the impact of naphthopyran isomerism on the mechanochromic properties, the study lays the foundation for the development of force-responsive polymers.
Naphthopyrans are molecular switches that produce highly colored merocyanine dyes upon photochemical or mechanochemical activation in polymers. The mechanochromic behavior of these molecular force probes enables the straightforward visualization of stress and/or strain in materials. To date, research on the mechanochemistry of naphthopyran has largely focused on the 3H-naphtho[2,1-b]pyran (3H) scaffold, whereas isomeric 2H-naphtho[1,2-b]pyrans (2H) exhibit complementary properties as suggested from their photochemical reactivity. Here we directly compare the reactivity of two isomeric 2H- and 3H-naphthopyran mechanophores in solution-phase ultrasonication experiments and in crosslinked polydimethylsiloxane elastomers subjected to uniaxial tensile deformation. The prototypical 3H-naphthopyran mechanophore produces a yellow merocyanine dye that reverts quickly, while the 2H-naphthopyran mechanophore generates a red merocyanine dye that reverts significantly slower. The trends in absorption and reversion measured in solution are also reflected in solid polymeric materials activated in tension. Building on recent research into substituent effects, this study identifies naphthopyran isomerism as a simple lever for modulating the mechanochromic properties of the naphthopyran mechanophore used in the development of force-responsive polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据