4.7 Article

Electrospun Core-Shell Structure Fibers for Puerarin-Loaded Vascular Grafts

期刊

ACS APPLIED POLYMER MATERIALS
卷 3, 期 8, 页码 4195-4202

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.1c00633

关键词

puerarin; coaxial electrospinning; core-shell structure; biocompatibility; poly(L-lactic acid); drug release

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, vascular grafts loaded with puerarin were prepared using electrospinning technology, resulting in fibers with a core-shell structure similar to natural blood vessels. The puerarin-loaded fibers were found to be non-toxic to endothelial cells and had a prolonged drug release cycle.
Nowadays, small-diameter vascular grafts are attracting considerable interest in tissue engineering and are in great demand in clinical trials. However, the defect of weak patency limits the application of small-caliber vessels in the coronary artery and peripheral vessel bypass graft surgery. Research shows that puerarin can protect endothelial cells from damage caused by inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. Simultaneously, puerarin can promote endothelial cell proliferation and differentiation. In this study, puerarin-loaded vascular grafts were made through coaxial electrospinning with gelatin by taking poly(L-lactic acid) as the carrier material and multiwalled carbon nanotubes as reinforced materials. The results showed that the resultant fibers have a core-shell structure with enhanced hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, mechanical properties, and degradability, which are in good agreement with the properties of natural blood vessels. Compared with the commercially available puerarin drugs, the drug release cycle of the as-prepared puerarin-loaded core-shell structure fiber is effectively prolonged and highly efficient. Moreover, the biocompatibility test showed that the fiber that contains puerarin has no toxicity and side effects on endothelial cells, will not cause hemolysis, and meets the national safety regulations for medical materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据