4.7 Article

Polydimethylsiloxane-Based Mechanoluminescent Occlusal Splint with the Visualization of Occlusal Force

期刊

ACS APPLIED POLYMER MATERIALS
卷 3, 期 10, 页码 5180-5187

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.1c00917

关键词

soft occlusal splint; biological performance; mechanoluminescence; mechanics visualization; occlusal detection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81970976]
  2. Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Gansu Province [20JR5RA572]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ZnS:Mn2+/polydimethylsiloxane composite elastomers show superior mechanical and biological properties compared to commercial occlusal splint materials, making them suitable for occlusal splint applications. The material exhibits intense and stable mechanoluminescence under oral conditions, providing a visualized approach for convenient and real-time detection of occlusal high points.
The occlusal splint is a common medical device that is used to treat temporomandibular disorders. However, the current commercial occlusal splints still have several disadvantages in terms of flexibility, abrasion resistance, and occlusal inspection. In this work, ZnS:Mn2+/polydimethylsiloxane composite elastomers were prepared, and the mechanical and biological properties were investigated to evaluate their potential as occlusal splint materials. The results suggest that compared to the commercial occlusal splint material, ZnS:Mn2+/polydimethylsiloxane exhibits desirable flexibility, improved wear resistance, and excellent biocompatibility and antibacterial properties. In addition, the elastomer shows intense and stable mechanoluminescence under oral conditions with a linear relationship to the applied load. This further provides a visualized approach for the convenient and real-time detection of occlusal high points. Based on the above results, a mechanoluminescent occlusal splint model was fabricated, which is promising to be applied in occlusal splint therapy applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据