4.8 Article

Autocorrection of lung boundary on 3D CT lung cancer images*

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.02.009

关键词

CADe system; Lung; Segmentation; Boundary correction

资金

  1. Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada
  2. Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Male lung cancer has the highest mortality rate, with juxta-pleural and juxtavascular nodules being the most common types on the lung surface. The research aims for fast computational time and low error in covering nodule areas.
Lung cancer in men has the highest mortality rate among all types of cancer. Juxta-pleural and juxtavascular are the most common nodules located on the lung surface. A computer aided detection (CADe) system is effective for assisting radiologists in diagnosing lung nodules. However, the lung segmentation step requires sophisticated methods when juxta-pleural and juxta-vascular nodules are present. Fast computational time and low error in covering nodule areas are the aims of this study. The proposed method consists of five stages, namely ground truth (GT) extraction, data preparation, tracheal extraction, separation of lung fusion and lung border correction. The used data consist of 57 3D CT lung cancer images taken from selected LIDC-IDRI dataset. These nodules are determined as the outer areas labeled by four radiologists. The proposed method achieves the fastest computational time of 0.32 s per slice or 60 times faster than that of conventional adaptive border marching (ABM). Moreover, it produces under segmentation of nodule value as low as 14.6%. It indicates that the proposed method has a potential to be embedded in the lung CADe system to cover pleural juxta and vascular nodule areas in lung segmentation. (c) 2019 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据